1
‘Zero’- the last major
invention in the
history of numbers is the result of a long and slow evolution.
Unfortunately we
do not have precise evidence of ‘zero origin’ and in most occasions we
rely on
assumptions based on Archaeology and historical events.
It
all started with the introduction of numbers, probably because of
practical
needs: how many days, goods, animals, children, etc.
The first written numbering
system in
record history it’s from the fourth millennium BCE in Elam (Iran
today), but the first evidence for zero is from the Sumerians in Mesopotamia (5000 years ago). It wasn’t a
notation, just
a space used as a place holder for empty columns in the ‘cuneiform’
writing (wedge-shaped marks in soft clay). [1][3]
The
first evidence of an actual sign for zero (
) comes
from “Mathematical Tablet from
Uruk”
(present at Louvre
Museum), dated
from the
Seleucid Period, late third/early second century BC. But ‘zero’ does
not seem
to have been imagined as nothing, just positional because in a text
referring
to distribution of grains the scribe writes that “the grain
is finished” instead of zero.[1-p152]
When
the Spaniards conquered Central America
(the
sixteenth century) the Maya(pre-Columbian culture) was extinct for
several
generations and unfortunately most of the remains from this culture
were
destroyed in the attempt to Christianize and
also to destroy the evidence of the Aztecs
bloodthirstiness.
The Maya possessed a true zero
that was
related to religion and aesthetic ideas (Gods were caring the time-units[1][2]
), represented by a sign resembling to a snail-shell (
) (“The Dresden Codex”-
kept in Germany-
one of the only three ancient Maya manuscripts that escaped from the
conquistadors).[1-p310]
In
China
we find the first appearance of ‘zero’ is in a mathematic problem of “Old Man of JiangXian” (where the space
left for zero creates problems in finding his age). But only since the
eight
century CE did the Chinese begin to introduce a special positional sign
( ) for commercial purposes and it’s
believed
that ‘zero’ reached them through the Indian influence.[1]
India’s
positional system is ‘mother of modern system’. The initial sign for
zero was a
dot called
“sunya” and later as on
the
“Manuscript from Beksali” (Pakistan today)
dated between the ninth and twelfth century CE written in ‘Sanscrit’
language[1]. From the sixth century onwards (‘Gupta’s
Dynasty’) the use of zero begins
to appear frequently in documents from India
and S-E Asia. It is believed that
from now it
took place the invention of zero and it’s operational potential (well
established on Brahmagupta’s book, written in 628, where positive
numbers=fortune, negative=debts and zero is “sunya”
(void, empty) or “kha”(nothing).[5]
1
From here ‘zero’ migrated to
Arab lands
where the first important mathematician to make use of his positional
relation
was Muhammmad ibn Al-Khwarizmi(783-850 )
who made significant contributions to the popularisation of Indian
numerals(incl.
zero), calculation methods, algebra(“Al
Jabr”) and algorithms (“Al-Khwarizmi”).[1][3]
The
Romans’s and the Greeks’s ‘additional system’ was incompatible with the
Hindu-Arab
‘positional system’ so ‘zero’ penetrated after long time, because their
intention was to impose religion and culture to the “infidels”
of the Middle East.[1]
The change was a long process,
amongst the
figures that had a significant contribution is Leonardo Fibonacci (of Pisa), an Italian mathematician that travelled to
Near
East and to North Africa (his father
being a
public scribe). Fibonacci wrote a book called “Liber Abaci”(Book
of Abacus) and the first chapter opens with: ”These are
nine figure of the Indians: 9 8 7
6 5 4 3 2 1 . With these nine figures and with this sign o which in arabic is called
zephirum, any number
can be written” [3-p71][4- p 102-108]
The
Renaissance was a very prolific period and still at that time the
status of
zero represents “a source of confusion”
as we can read in the manuscript: ”Triparty
en la Science des nombres” by Nicolas Chuquet (1484): “the
tenth (ref to 0)does not
have or signify a value, and it is called cipher or nothing or figure
of no
value”[4-chapt 6]
The main question in the
fifteenth century
was ‘Zero- nothing or something’. The French writers called zero “ a figure
causing confusion and difficulty”, because it is usually regarded
as nothing(3+0=3),
but sometimes is something: 40000- the string of nothingness multiplies
the 4
ten thousand times.[2]
In
today’s days is difficult to give
in one idea the huge extent of ‘zero’ and seems “impossible without it”.
|